Archive for January, 2008

Calling Ben and Steve R

Some may have noticed that badchemist has not been seen on the badscience forums for some time. Unfortunately I decided to update my email address on there a couple of months ago and since my account has been suspended and I haven’t received an email to either my previous account or the one I changed. I’ve tried emailing Ben but haven’t had any luck yet (trying again now). If any of the badscience posse would like to try and get my account sorted on my behalf it would be appreciated and you would win the interweb.

Username = badchemist

(new) Email =

email address

Greetings from Oxford

I’m currently bored sat in a pub in Oxford drinking beer and abusing free wi-fi. Second time I’ve made the rather long journey down from The North in 3 weeks but it seems to have paid off and although I haven’t had a formal offer I will soon (a month or 2) be moving down here to take up a post-doc position in the Dept. of Clinical Pharmacology.

Once I’m down here proper I’ll update, I’ll be looking for any of the badscience posse in the area for potential drinking buddies.

Just need to finish that bloody thesis now….

Fight back against spam

Recently I’ve received a couple of emails from a lovely lady called Barbara Couley.

I visited your site and contents of your site http://badchemist.net/c got my attention. I am interested in purchasing Text links advertisement on it.
If you are interested please inform me.
I can make an attractive offer.
Thanks,

Barbara Couley

and

Hi,

I sent you an email few days back, I am interested in purchasing text link advertisment place on your website http://badchemist.net/. Let me know if interested so we can discuss further details as well. I can make a good offer to make it worth your time.

Let me know!
Thanks
Barbara

This pisses me off, I don’t want advertising on my site, never have and never will. The only chance of it happening are if this site suddenly becomes extremely popular and I can’t afford to upgrade or my webhost will cut me off i.e. a last resort. More annoying my email address is only available as an image on this site to reduce spammers by making it harder to get it automatically.

I would suggest that everyone sends one to her (barbaracouley@gmail.com), but that might result in us all getting even more spam back. If anyone else gets this pain in the arse contacting them, I feel your pain, just ignore the twunt.

Voluntary regulation of CAM - more psuedo-regulation

It’s been a while since I posted: thesis writing, job hunting and Xmas have taken their toll. Anyway hopefully I’ll be able to find some more time now.

Now for the point of this post. According to the Daily Hate there is to be new regulation of CAM. beginning in April. I’m all for proper regulation of CAM, too many charlatans have been peddling their snake oil for far too long, so this should really make me happy - unfortunately it doesn’t.

The Foundation of Integrative Health the organisation set up by probably the worlds most famous CAM advocate, HRH the Prince of Wales, are behind the scheme. More info about it can be found here. Apparently the scheme is

… being modelled on the General Medical Council and will follow Government guidelines for self-regulatory bodies.

but, with current legislation,

Although the council will be able to strike practitioners from the register there is nothing to stop them continuing to give treatments.

So although this will give the public a single place to see if their preferred charlatan CAM practitioner is recognised to practice to a professional standard there is still no way of preventing sub-standard quacks from practising their ‘art’ except in a few areas where statutory regulation already exists (chiropractors and osteopaths) or where such regulation is to be introduced (trad. chinese medicine and acupuncture). Hopefully this body will take their responsibilities more seriously than the SoH fiasco and the like and actually remove practitioners who fail to meet guidelines as otherwise this will be an utterly useless list.

UPDATE: When I wrote this earlier I was in a bit of a hurry and forgot one major point. The treatments/practices covered by this new regulatory body have very little, if any, evidence for their efficacy. Now I don’t care if someone wants to waste their money on useless treatments as long as the treatments are not being mis-sold as effective and they are being used for self-limiting conditions where the placebo effect can be of particular benefit. Unfortunately producing a regulatory body for snake oil only adds credence to the claims particularly as it is, in part, funded by the NHS.

EDIT: By way of Freudian slip I managed to put the Princess of Wales.