<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Badchemist's Blog &#187; KKKly Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://badchemist.net/category/kkkly-mail/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://badchemist.net</link>
	<description>Science, Pseudoscience and Junk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 20:22:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Daily Mail ignores own terrible reporting and blames the media</title>
		<link>http://badchemist.net/badscience/daily-mail-ignores-own-terrible-reporting-and-blames-the-media</link>
		<comments>http://badchemist.net/badscience/daily-mail-ignores-own-terrible-reporting-and-blames-the-media#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>badchemist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bad reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Badscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cunts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KKKly Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science commnication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badchemist.net/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Daily Mail has reported on the suicide of an Indian girl that they have attributed to fears over the LHC.
Indian girl, 16, &#8216;killed herself over fears Big Bang experiment could lead to end of the world&#8217;
I don&#8217;t wish to discuss the circumstances behind her death but further information may be found here.
Her father, identified [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://badchemist.net/badscience/daily-mail-ignores-own-terrible-reporting-and-blames-the-media/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Mail Mass Hysteria Over LHC &#8211; Updated</title>
		<link>http://badchemist.net/badscience/daily-mail-mass-hysteria-over-lhc</link>
		<comments>http://badchemist.net/badscience/daily-mail-mass-hysteria-over-lhc#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>badchemist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bad reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Badscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KKKly Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loonies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badchemist.net/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last week or so the Daily Heil has published several stories about the LHC all using their typical non-hysterical, sensible style of reporting. We&#8217;ve had:
Are we all going to die next Wednesday?
Meet Evans the Atom, who will end the world on Wednesday
and rather more sensibly:
Scientists receive death threats over Big Bang experiment from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://badchemist.net/badscience/daily-mail-mass-hysteria-over-lhc/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Detection of breast cancer by hair</title>
		<link>http://badchemist.net/good-science/detection-of-breast-cancer-by-hair</link>
		<comments>http://badchemist.net/good-science/detection-of-breast-cancer-by-hair#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>badchemist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bad reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KKKly Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badchemist.net/uncategorized/detection-of-breast-cancer-by-hair</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the KKKly Mail today:
Hair test to detect breast cancer could be on sale &#8216;within months&#8217;
A revolutionary test that detects the first signs of breast cancer from a few strands of a woman&#8217;s hair could be on sale within months.
Having scanned the references from the website of Fermiscan there doesn&#8217;t appear to be anything wrong [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://badchemist.net/good-science/detection-of-breast-cancer-by-hair/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voluntary regulation of CAM &#8211; more psuedo-regulation</title>
		<link>http://badchemist.net/badscience/voluntary-regulation-of-cam-more-psuedo-regulation</link>
		<comments>http://badchemist.net/badscience/voluntary-regulation-of-cam-more-psuedo-regulation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>badchemist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Badscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KKKly Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society of Homeopaths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badchemist.net/badscience/voluntary-regulation-of-cam-more-psuedo-regulation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a while since I posted: thesis writing, job hunting and Xmas have taken their toll. Anyway hopefully I&#8217;ll be able to find some more time now.
Now for the point of this post. According to the Daily Hate there is to be new regulation of CAM. beginning in April. I&#8217;m all for proper regulation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://badchemist.net/badscience/voluntary-regulation-of-cam-more-psuedo-regulation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alternative Health Screening: lunacy of lifesaver?</title>
		<link>http://badchemist.net/badscience/alternative-health-screening-lunacy-of-lifesaver</link>
		<comments>http://badchemist.net/badscience/alternative-health-screening-lunacy-of-lifesaver#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>badchemist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Badscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KKKly Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine and Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badchemist.net/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Mail today, there is a surprisingly sensible article on alternative health screening with a road test to boot.
Prior to trying out this &#8220;screenings&#8221; the author, Charlotte Dovey, rather more sensibly paid BUPA to screen using conventional methods &#8211; blood tests and the like. According to the BUPA Wellwoman Health Assessment (£265 a go):
After the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://badchemist.net/badscience/alternative-health-screening-lunacy-of-lifesaver/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sugar confusion and some (relatively) sane advice from Holford</title>
		<link>http://badchemist.net/badscience/sugar-confusion-and-some-relatively-sane-advice-from-holford</link>
		<comments>http://badchemist.net/badscience/sugar-confusion-and-some-relatively-sane-advice-from-holford#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 17:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>badchemist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Badscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KKKly Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine and Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutribollocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pilltrick Healthfraud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badchemist.net/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a story in in the Mail regarding obesity and sugar consumption. The content in itself is rather dubious, Professor Glenn Gaesser of Univ. of Virginia is claiming that carbohydrates are not fattening but he is part funded by the baking industry. Conflict of interests may arise here I feel.
In the comments we also have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://badchemist.net/badscience/sugar-confusion-and-some-relatively-sane-advice-from-holford/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
